association-list

December 7, 2006

An excellent Blindsight review.

no tags — evan @ 9:32 am

Niall Harrison’s review of Blind­sight is the best that I have seen thus far. You should read the book first, per­haps, as there are many spoil­ers, but you should read it in any case because it’s one of the best SF books to have come out this year. Pass the link around, because more people should see it.

December 5, 2006

A few more books down.

no tags — evan @ 10:21 pm

So. I’ve been work­ing on other things lately, hence the scarcity of blog­ging, and this book­shelf update will be a short one. I’ve just fin­ished a couple of books, and I thought that I would men­tion them, just to get the fin­gers moving

Car­ni­val by Eliz­a­beth Bear.

I liked Blood and Iron and The Chains That you Refuse, but I have to admit that I stalled out on World­wired. I’ll finish it even­tu­ally, but in the mean­time, I decided to pick up Car­ni­val, to see what Bear can do in a more free-​​wheeling science-​​fictional mode. The set­ting is in a pretty grim far future, where AI over­lords unleashed by the far left have turned Earth into a pretty nasty place to live, where the unfit are Assessed, which is to say, instantly killed and recy­cled by their implants. All of this is some­what periph­eral to the action, though, at least as it con­cerns the story as it hap­pens. It speaks pretty deeply to the character’s moti­va­tions, but it isn’t really the inter­est­ing part of the story, so I won’t much dis­cuss it here.

The meat of the action involves two long-​​separated lovers, two homo­sex­ual males with names so dis­tress­ingly long that I imag­ine Bear just typed VK and MKJ and searched and replaced them when it was time to submit the man­u­script. They’re sent there on a mis­sion by the powers that be on Earth to the deeply self-​​consciously named New-​​Amazonia, where women rule, men are chat­tel, etc. The world-​​building is pretty intense in places, but it’s some­what uneven. Since our per­spec­tive is mostly (there’s a third, native, view­point char­ac­ter, but she doesn’t get as much time at the fore) out­sider, we don’t get a whole lot of a feel as for what it’s like to be one of these people, with their starkly dif­fer­ent mores and strange cul­ture, and the car­ni­val that names the book is strangely dis­tant, essen­tially Mardi-​​Gras, and we never really get a feel for it. Those caveats aside, the main char­ac­ters and what they’re doing are richly drawn and sharply plot­ted, and the sex scenes are lightly han­dled enough that they won’t squick anyone who doesn’t already have deeply seated issues. I thought that the ending was a little rushed, but over­all I would rec­om­mend the book, and con­tinue to look for­ward to Bear’s forth­com­ing work.

The Android’s Dream, by John Scalzi.

I enjoy Scalzi’s work, to an extent, although I think that his main line of novels lack some of the moral heft that I feel they should have, con­sid­er­ing their sub­ject matter. Also, I admit to some big­otry for SF that’s over-​​focused on plan­ets, as Scalzi’s tends to be. But that’s nei­ther here nor there. They’re quick and fun and breezily writ­ten with a sharp eye for human foibles and the humor inher­ent even in dark moments, of which there is no lack.

This book was lighter even than most of his others, though, and I came away a little bit unsat­is­fied. There were a few rea­sons, one of which is that the book hinges pretty strongly on some unlikely ele­ments, like a race that relies on top down com­puter con­trol of every little thing allow­ing another species entirely to design them a com­puter system to help do that work, and no one ever trying to hack or sub­vert it, or even get overly famil­iar with it. I didn’t really ring true. Also, the idea that in hun­dreds of thou­sands of years of galac­tic his­tory, the idea that no one, ever, before human­ity, would bother to try sim­u­lat­ing a brain on a com­puter, it kind of absurd. Most of this takes place off-​​screen, so it doesn’t directly detract from the book, but they subtly under­mine the impact of the res­o­lu­tion, which counts against it in the end.

The book is short, which I applaud in a non-​​snarky way, and it stands alone, which is also admirable. The char­ac­ters are fun and inter­est­ing, although the main char­ac­ter is too much the self-​​effacing com­pe­tent man to ever really come into his own as a char­ac­ter. The book moves along briskly, touch­ing lightly on the emo­tional res­o­nances of war and people’s gen­eral inabil­ity to deal with it after the fact. Over­all, it’s more fun than any­thing else, and it doesn’t strive to be much else than fun. You could fault it for that lack of striv­ing, I guess, but it would make you ill tem­pered and blind to many things.

The Jen­nifer Morgue, by Char­lie Stross.

Another one in the tra­di­tion of The Atroc­ity Archives, this time a take of Ian Fleming’s James Bond books. Unfor­tu­nately, per­haps since the Flem­ing books are worse than the source mate­r­ial for the books that inspired Archives, this book, while inter­est­ing, hews per­haps too close, and gets too self-​​referential, which takes some­thing out of the enjoy­ment, in the end. If you’ve read Archives (I sug­gest that you do, if you haven’t), you might be dis­ap­pointed by this one, as I was, a little. Still fun, but I have the feel­ing that Char­lie has a crack­er­jack book in this series that will out-​​shine these first two entries by an order of mag­ni­tude. Char­lie is pretty good at his worst, and aston­ish­ing at his best. This is a pretty good book, which means that I enjoyed it, but it doesn’t really live up to the unfil­tered Stross expe­ri­ence which I’ve come to expect.

Latro in the Mist & Sol­dier of Sidon, by Gene Wolfe.

Oh wow. I don’t know if I’ve men­tioned it, but Gene Wolfe is far and away one of my favorite authors. It is unlikely that I will ever escape from his influ­ence in my own writ­ing, although I could never hope to pro­duce things as pow­er­ful. In these books, Wolfe fol­lows a Roman sol­dier in Greece and later, Egypt, who has suf­fered a head wound and cannot remem­ber for more than twenty four hours at a time. Thus he must write down every­thing in order that he might remem­ber. The metafic­tional con­ceit here is that Wolfe has been given the scrolls by a friend to trans­late them, some­thing sim­i­lar to the meta­nar­ra­tive that enclosed the Book of the New Sun, although in those books, the nar­ra­tor, Sev­er­ian, has eidetic memory. There are a great many things that I would like to say here, but there’s so much to unpack, just from the one set of books, much less the two of them taken together. I might be here all night, and there are other things that I need to do. Just go out any buy them. Wolfe is our great­est author. You should have read them already. I should have read them already, but it’s better late than never. You might hold off on Sidon if you’re averse to a story left unfin­ished. The writ­ing is bru­tally beau­ti­ful, no one makes it felt like Wolfe.